GOF testing for nest survival models

questions concerning analysis/theory using program MARK

GOF testing for nest survival models

Postby jkemp » Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:54 pm

I notice that neither Dinsmore et al (2002) nor Jay Rotella's Chapter 14 address the issue of GOF testing for nest survival models. Is there a reason for this that i'm missing? A currently favoured method?
jkemp
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

GOF testing for nest survival models

Postby gwhite » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:29 am

Like the known fate data type, the saturated model for the nest survival data type is a useful model. Because the saturated model fits the data perfectly, there is no GOF test.

To help you understand this point, consider a simple radio-tracking study where 100 radios are put on a single age/sex class for one occasion. The saturated model is the simple survival estimate based on the binomial distribution. There is only one data point, hence one degree of freedom, and that d.f. is used to make the estimate of survival. NOBODY ever talks about a GOF test for this situation -- it is obvious that there is no GOF test available.

To obtain a GOF test, we have to assume a reasonable biological model that is reduced from the saturated model. This selection can be pretty arbitrary.

Gary
gwhite
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 9:05 am

GOF added to Chapter 14

Postby cooch » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:51 am

Thanks Gary -

Just added that text to Chapter 14 (which has just been uploaded).
cooch
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Cornell University

Postby jkemp » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:53 pm

Thanks very much Gary,

Josh
jkemp
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand


Return to analysis help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests