mean value of survival using variance components approach

questions concerning analysis/theory using program MARK

mean value of survival using variance components approach

Postby rems » Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:34 pm

Dear list:

The final example of chapter 6 Cooch and White manual states that the adequate approach to estimate a mean value of survival when you have a model with phi(t) is to employ a variance components approach based on a random intercept model, rather than using a phi(.) model or modifying the design matrix, since variance component approach incorporates the sampling and process variance.

I was wondering if any of you would be so kind to explain how to do the procedure in MARK since apparently the specification of this method has not been incorporated yet in the manual but promises to be (e.g. much more on this later on).

Kind Regards,

Roberto

--------------------------------------
Dr. Roberto Munguía-Steyer
University of Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
rems
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 8:40 pm

Re: mean value of survival using variance components approac

Postby cooch » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:02 pm

rems wrote:Dear list:

The final example of chapter 6 Cooch and White manual states that the adequate approach to estimate a mean value of survival when you have a model with phi(t) is to employ a variance components approach based on a random intercept model, rather than using a phi(.) model or modifying the design matrix, since variance component approach incorporates the sampling and process variance.

I was wondering if any of you would be so kind to explain how to do the procedure in MARK since apparently the specification of this method has not been incorporated yet in the manual but promises to be (e.g. much more on this later on).

Kind Regards,

Roberto

--------------------------------------
Dr. Roberto Munguía-Steyer
University of Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.


Actually, an 'intercept only' model, but it amounts to much the same thing. See same section of current version of Chapter 6.
cooch
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Cornell University

Postby rems » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:21 pm

Hi Evan:

Thanks a lot for your replay and your continuous updating of the manual, it is a great source of information. I was reading the chapter 6 version that appeared a month ago (29/07/09) and now I find that today's version (31/08/09) incorpotates how to do the estimation with the variance component approach.


Regards,

Roberto
rems
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 8:40 pm

Postby cooch » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:33 am

rems wrote:Hi Evan:

Thanks a lot for your replay and your continuous updating of the manual, it is a great source of information. I was reading the chapter 6 version that appeared a month ago (29/07/09) and now I find that today's version (31/08/09) incorpotates how to do the estimation with the variance component approach.


Regards,

Roberto


I just uploaded a slightly revised version. I've been hesitant putting this material online until a more complete treatment of random effects (and related things) is finished. But, the question of 'estimating the mean and process variance' comes up sufficiently often as a special case of the larger issue, that I decided in the end to add the material.
cooch
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Cornell University


Return to analysis help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests