Two-species model with equal detection probabilities

questions concerning analysis/theory using program PRESENCE

Two-species model with equal detection probabilities

Postby Orien Richmond » Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:42 pm

I'm running the two-species model using the phi parameterization. My data set consists of 168 sites surveyed up to three times each for two secretive marsh birds. I set up the detection history data with 168 rows for the first species and 168 rows for the second (336 total rows). My first run estimated all 8 parameters (psiA,psiB,phi,pA,pB,pA',pB',pAB) and went smoothly. The model with the assumption that detection probability is independent (psiA,psiB,phi,pA,pB,pA',pB') also went fine. However, when I ran the model which assumes equal detection probabilities (psiA,psiB,phi,pA,pB,pAB) it should have 6 parameters, but in the results browser and in the model output it only shows 5; the pAB parameter was not computed, even though it appeared correctly in the design matrix. Also, when I tried to run the model which assumes that occupancy is independent (psiA,psiB,pA',pB',pA,pB,pAB), Presence crashed several times and the results file was incomplete. Any help much appreciated!

Cheers,
Orien
Orien Richmond
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Postby darryl » Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:46 am

Orien,
I'll start with the obvious stuff.

1. How recently have you downloaded PRESENCE? There's were some issues with the two-species model a few months ok that have since been fixed.

2. Did you remember to unselect the 'detections are independent' option before running your second model?

Darryl
darryl
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand

Postby Orien Richmond » Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:21 pm

Hi Darryl,

I downloaded Presence yesterday, it's the current version.

Yes, I did unselect the 'detections are independent' option before running the model which assumes equal detection probabilities.
Orien Richmond
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:56 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Postby darryl » Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:55 pm

Orien
I just downloaded the latest and tried to fit models with another data set and struck the same problem. Seems like Jim may have accidentally introduced a bug at some point as it use to work. I'll let him know. Thanks for picking this one up.
Darryl
darryl
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand


Return to analysis help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests