Median c-hat procedure with dots (missing sessions)

questions concerning analysis/theory using program MARK

Median c-hat procedure with dots (missing sessions)

Postby rdanner » Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:36 pm

Dear Community,

I couldn't find anything on the forum or in the Book about this...

I'm modeling phi and p with CJS models using an encounter history data set where some sessions were not completed, so are represented as dots.

When I start the Median c-hat procedure, MARK gives the following warning: “Warning – Dots in the encounter histories are not properly handled with the bootstrap or median c-hat simulations.” If you go ahead with the bootstrapping, however, it does give a c-hat value. Does anyone know if it would be better to use this median c-hat value despite dots being mishandled, or to skip the median c-hat procedure altogether?

Not sure if it matters, but I built the models with RMark and exported them to MARK for the median c-hat analysis.

Thanks,
Ray
rdanner
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Virginia Tech

Re: Median c-hat procedure with dots (missing sessions)

Postby cooch » Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:47 pm

rdanner wrote:Dear Community,

I couldn't find anything on the forum or in the Book about this...

I'm modeling phi and p with CJS models using an encounter history data set where some sessions were not completed, so are represented as dots.

When I start the Median c-hat procedure, MARK gives the following warning: “Warning – Dots in the encounter histories are not properly handled with the bootstrap or median c-hat simulations.” If you go ahead with the bootstrapping, however, it does give a c-hat value. Does anyone know if it would be better to use this median c-hat value despite dots being mishandled, or to skip the median c-hat procedure altogether?

Not sure if it matters, but I built the models with RMark and exported them to MARK for the median c-hat analysis.

Thanks,
Ray


It means what it says -- for missing values, there is no entirely robust way of estimating c-hat. Period. If your estimated c-hat is >1, then at worst, using it will make your analysis 'more conservative'. Choice is yours.
cooch
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 4:11 pm
Location: Cornell University

Re: Median c-hat procedure with dots (missing sessions)

Postby rdanner » Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:15 pm

Thanks!
rdanner
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Virginia Tech

Re: Median c-hat procedure with dots (missing sessions)

Postby Fish_Boy » Thu Mar 01, 2012 6:04 pm

I may be wrong, but could you not simply remove the dots and set the time interval to the appropriate length? i.e., skip the occasion with incomplete information. It has been a while since I RTFM.
Fish_Boy
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Winnipeg


Return to analysis help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests

cron