Interpretation of 'occasion' with sustained data collection

Hi there! I'm working on a project using secr in R to model the results of a cat population intervention on a South Australian island using camera trap data. The central difficulty I'm grappling with relates to how I should delineate 'occasions'. The data were collected continually over a period of many weeks, and come associated with a given date and time. Given that's the case, I'm unsure how to marry this to the classical discrete occasion model built into secr.
Basically, I see three options:
- throw out the occasions entirely, considering the collection period as one single occasion (I /may/ have seen something suggesting something similar to this for audio sampling, but I didn't look into it, and it didn't seem designed for long periods). Obviously you're losing information here, and it seems deeply inelegant, not preferred
- artificially break up the occasions by day (or probably more accurately putting the split at midday due to nocturnalism): seems good for many purposes? (if a little bit of an approximation)
- break up the occasions into a very fine grained system, on the order of minutes, so that no two readings occur on the same occasion: I don't know enough about the internals of the models to know to what extent this is statistically sound, but it intuitively makes sense to me; the parameters all just being scaled very differently with time, but I could also see this massively zero inflating the model and being very improper, aswell as being very slow.
Any help that could be offered would be greatly appreciated! I won't lie and say that I haven't noticed the author of all the documentation I've been reading answering every thread I've perused on here...
Basically, I see three options:
- throw out the occasions entirely, considering the collection period as one single occasion (I /may/ have seen something suggesting something similar to this for audio sampling, but I didn't look into it, and it didn't seem designed for long periods). Obviously you're losing information here, and it seems deeply inelegant, not preferred
- artificially break up the occasions by day (or probably more accurately putting the split at midday due to nocturnalism): seems good for many purposes? (if a little bit of an approximation)
- break up the occasions into a very fine grained system, on the order of minutes, so that no two readings occur on the same occasion: I don't know enough about the internals of the models to know to what extent this is statistically sound, but it intuitively makes sense to me; the parameters all just being scaled very differently with time, but I could also see this massively zero inflating the model and being very improper, aswell as being very slow.
Any help that could be offered would be greatly appreciated! I won't lie and say that I haven't noticed the author of all the documentation I've been reading answering every thread I've perused on here...