Hi Lourens
The general answer to your question might be 'relax - that's what capture--recapture is for'.
My specific answer for spatially explicit capture-recapture runs like this:
Conceptually, there is an indefinitely large number of leopards out there that might ultimately appear at your cameras, so we do not expect an asymptote and estimates of density should be unbiased regardless. Many times there will be one, either because the curve gets very nearly flat once the cameras have exhausted the 'easy pickings' of the immediate population, or because the biological population really is finite.
The 'exhaustion' effect depends on the shape of the detection function. It is greatest with short-tailed detection (e.g., halfnormal) and least if the function has a long tail (e.g. exponential or hazard rate). This relates to patterns of movement.
It is also possible that turnover in the population will cause an otherwise asymptotic curve to steepen. This is something to be aware of, and may justify cutting a long camera trapping series into 2 or more sections.
Murray
Here is some code to illustrate my claims above (yes, I know the numbers are unrealistic!)
- Code: Select all
library(secr)
grid <- make.grid(spacing = 40) ## default grid is 6 x 6
CH.EX <- sim.capthist(grid, pop = list(D=20, buffer = 1000), detectfn = 'EX',
detectpar = list(g0=0.05, sigma=50), noccasions = 100)
## nonasymptotic accumulation curve
plot(1:100, counts(CH.EX)[['M(t+1)']][-101], ylim = c(0,800), xlab = 'Occasion', ylab = 'M(t+1)', type='l')
## select just 20 occasions and fit model
fit <- secr.fit(subset(CH.EX, occasions = 1:20), buffer = 300, detectfn = 'EX')
options(digits=3)
predict(fit)
# link estimate SE.estimate lcl ucl
# D log 17.5341 1.32924 15.1164 20.3386
# g0 logit 0.0553 0.00376 0.0484 0.0631
# sigma log 50.8838 2.25264 46.6568 55.4938