SE.estimate and CI

Hi All,
I might have a very simple question, but it is giving me some trouble. I have run secr models incorporating sex as a covariate in both sigma and p, as CL=True
I then use to
to get density and SE estimates. My question is related to SE and the lcl and ucl estimated
estimate SE.estimate lcl ucl CVn CVa CVD
D 5.175057e -04 0.0002825136 0.0001901883 0.001408142 0.3336084 0.4321198 0.545914
From my understanding 95 % CI can also be computed as , mean +-1.96*SE. My qeustion is why does the CI estimated here differ from the 'manual' calculation? Or am I completely off the ball here? If I am correct, which value should I use for my CI?
Thanks for response.
Lourens
I might have a very simple question, but it is giving me some trouble. I have run secr models incorporating sex as a covariate in both sigma and p, as CL=True
- Code: Select all
Msex2.lap<-secr.fit(lap.ch, model = list(g0~Sex, sigma~Sex), mask=mask.lap,CL=T, trace = FALSE)
I then use to
- Code: Select all
derived(Msex2.lap, alpha = 0.05, se.D = TRUE))
to get density and SE estimates. My question is related to SE and the lcl and ucl estimated
estimate SE.estimate lcl ucl CVn CVa CVD
D 5.175057e -04 0.0002825136 0.0001901883 0.001408142 0.3336084 0.4321198 0.545914
From my understanding 95 % CI can also be computed as , mean +-1.96*SE. My qeustion is why does the CI estimated here differ from the 'manual' calculation? Or am I completely off the ball here? If I am correct, which value should I use for my CI?
Thanks for response.
Lourens