Nest survival procedure vs. Cox proportional hazards

Forum for discussion of general questions related to study design and/or analysis of existing data - software neutral.

Nest survival procedure vs. Cox proportional hazards

Postby B.K. Sandercock » Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Dear Colleagues:

I have been using the nest survival procedure as a known fates model for ragged telemetry data. I have an analysis that is basically an ANCOVA type design with weekly survival of radio-marked birds vs. a categorical explanatory variable and a continuous explanatory variable.

If I analyze the data in Mark with the nest survival procedure, I can get overall estimates of weekly survival from different models of the explanatory variables (cat, con, cat+con, cat*con, etc.).

I have also analyzed the data with time-to-event models in Program R and can generate Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots and hazard functions not available in Mark (survival, gss packages). The hazard functions seem particularly useful because I can model them with splines to look at seasonal patterns of mortality risk. I have used Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) to test the effects of the explanatory variables in different combinations, and can include female id as a random factor. What is less obvious to me is how to generate plots of weekly survival vs. the two explanatory variables from the different CPH models.

Would it be acceptable to mix and match results from the two sets of analyses? My understanding from the Gentle Introduction is that the known fate and nest survival procedures are basically KM models but redefined as binomial models for MLE (16-1, 17-4). Perhaps this is the reason that one can get the plots in Mark but not with the KM or CPH models. Anybody else wrestled with this issue? If it is possible to plot weekly survival vs. explanatory factors from the results of a CPH model, I would be interested to see an example of an R script. Comments or suggestions welcome.

Thanks, Brett (bsanderc@ksu.edu)
B.K. Sandercock
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:18 pm
Location: Norwegian Institute of Nature Research

Re: Nest survival procedure vs. Cox proportional hazards

Postby sixtystrat » Fri Jun 17, 2022 9:18 am

Brett:
Did you ever get a good answer to your question? I am facing a similar problem. Thanks!
Joe
sixtystrat
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:19 am

Re: Nest survival procedure vs. Cox proportional hazards

Postby B.K. Sandercock » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:31 am

Hi Joe:

I think the tools with Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox proportional hazards, and hazard rates are more flexible for analyzing telemetry data if you make the assumption that detectability is close to one. If you want some sample R code to play with, see the Downloads for Chapter 6 from Population Ecology in Practice:
https://www.wiley.com/en-no/Population+ ... 0470674147
Good luck with your analyses.

Regards, Brett.
B.K. Sandercock
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:18 pm
Location: Norwegian Institute of Nature Research


Return to analysis & design questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests