Hi. I am a graduate student analyzing a data-set of small mammal trapping data from 1997 to present. I have three grids that were trapped simultaneously in the fall of each year, and one additional grid that was trapped inconsistently. Grids were trapped for three days (setting in evening, checking in the morning). Virtually no animals survived between years, and the time between trapping periods was greater than a generation length, so survival over the study period is inconsequential. Each grid was distant enough from other grids that no animals could move between grids.
My plan is to use the three trapping days as occasions for a Jolly-Seber model, and estimate abundance for each year. I will then compare abundance to my other variables (climate, environment). My question is, should I combine the data from all grids for a single year into one model, and estimate abundance from that, or estimate abundance separately for each grid, and either combine the estimates or leave them separate and use each as a different data point. The grids are a bit different from each other, with some species only present on certain grids (i.e. voles only present at the more moist grid, mice present at all grids) and some variation in habitat.
My second query concerns small sample sizes. I read in some papers about small sample size corrections for J-S. There is some variability in number of individuals caught, ranging from 4 to 100+ per grid. I have seen it referenced, but haven't found anything on how to actually do these corrections. If anyone could link a reference for me to pursue, that would be much appreciated.