Simulating in R, analyzing in RMark/MARK, estimation problem

posts related to the RMark library, which may not be of general interest to users of 'classic' MARK

Simulating in R, analyzing in RMark/MARK, estimation problem

Postby claudiapenaloza » Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:34 pm

Hello All,

I simulated encounter histories for a Multistate Robust Design in R and have analyzed them in RMark and MARK but something is wrong.

The model has four states A, a, D and d ("a" is unobservable for "A", "D" and "d" are absorbing states). Transitions between "A" and "a", and detection for "A" are being estimated correctly but transitions between "A" and "D" or "d", and detection of "D" and "d" are not. In the later case, the transitions are estimated at half what they should be and the detection probability is being estimated twice as much as it should be.

Any idea why this could be happeing? (aside from the obvious "your simulation is incorrect", which is probably true but why then the coincidental 1/2 to 2x in paired transition/detection?)

Any help greatly appreciated,
claudia
claudiapenaloza
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: York, SC

Re: Simulating in R, analyzing in RMark/MARK, estimation pro

Postby jlaake » Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:38 pm

Claudia-

You may want to post this in a different sub-forum as it isn't really about RMark. Not sure that I have any insights other than that it makes sense that those parameters might tradeoff in that manner but beyond that not sure what to say.

regards --jeff
jlaake
 
Posts: 1480
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:50 pm
Location: Escondido, CA

Re: Simulating in R, analyzing in RMark/MARK, estimation pro

Postby claudiapenaloza » Fri May 17, 2013 2:13 pm

After talking to Bill Kendall for a long time... we determined (non-rigorously) that these parameters are confounded. I am now going down another route.
claudiapenaloza
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: York, SC


Return to RMark

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests