tds wrote:When model averaging, one of the results is the Percent of Variation Attributable to Model Variation. Could someone explain what this is telling me? Much thanks.
tds wrote:That explanation is much clearer than the book. Thank you.
OK, so a high Percent of Variation Attributable to Model Variation would mean a high model selection uncertainty. Therefore, I assume the weighted average is not as reliable (validated by the large 95% CI).
How do folks decide if the Percent of Variation Attributable to Model Variation is so high that the results are unreasonable to use? Or do folks tend to use the weighted average results, assuming the degree of reliability is illustrated by the large confidence intervals?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest