by Eurycea » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:43 pm
It sounds like a similar problem that I've had with my data set, where I would get nonsensical results with SE of 0 or 1. When this happens, MARK doesn't count the number of parameters correctly and so you must do it by hand. There is some guidance in the MARK book on counting the number of parameters, however you may have bigger problems because of this potential "partial convergence failure," where you didn't get proper estimates for some of your parameters. Your data may be too sparse to generate these estimates. Alternatively you can try using the Simulated Annealing option when you run the model, to help it from being stuck on local maxima. Hopefully this helps until someone else with more experience chimes in.
Nathan