by bmcclintock » Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:37 am
Hi Alyssa,
Unfortunately, the instructions for creating artificial encounter histories in the absence of individually identifiable marks is limited to pages 18-5 and 18-6 of the The Book. The bottom line is that they can be generated any number of ways, as long as: 1) the sums of each column in the encounter history (when each individual entry, 1 or 0, is multiplied by the corresponding frequency) is equal to the total number of marked individual sightings for the respective sighting occasion; and 2) the sums of the frequencies with non-missing entries (i.e., not “....”) for each primary interval equals the known number of marked individuals in the population during the primary interval. For example, for 3 primary intervals each consisting of 4 sighting occasions:
11111111..... 5;
111011110111 3;
011011110110 1;
....11100110 1;
This would indicate that 5*1+3*1+1*0 = 8 marked individuals were sighted on the 1st sighting occasion of primary interval 1, and 3*1+1*1+1*1 = 5 marked individuals were sighted on the 3rd sighting occasion of primary interval 3. There were 5+3+1 = 9 marked individuals known to be in the population during primary interval 1, 5+3+1+1 = 10 marked individuals known to be in the population during primary interval 2, and 3+1+1 = 5 marked individuals known to be in the population during primary interval 3. Another way of presenting exactly the same data (makes no difference to MARK):
11111111..... 1;
11111111..... 1;
11111111..... 1;
11111111..... 1;
11111111..... 1;
111011110111 1;
111011110111 1;
111011110111 1;
011011110110 1;
....11100110 1;
or even
111111110111 1;
111011110110 1;
11111111..... 1;
....1111..... 1;
11111111..... 1;
111111110111 1;
111011110111 1;
11101111.... 1;
011011110110 1;
11111110.... 1;
It really doesn't matter as long as these 2 conditions are satisfied. It might be nice to put together a script to do this for us, but for the time being I don't know of one. Perhaps I'll get working on one if there's demand.
Cheers,
Brett