Hi Everyone-
I had a question about data coding that has bothered me.
I am stuck on the fact that if you use the last day checked and alive as the end date of a nest, then are you not biasing survivorship estimates low because that was not the entire nest period? You missed n number of days the chicks were actually exposed from last date know alive to last nest check (where you found it empty and coded as fledged for any number of reasons).
Perhaps, part of the problem is that this method was developed with the assumption that hatch date was known exactly (or could be predicted based on known nest age). Everything subsequently has also carried this assumption. But, here and many other studies, we wish to use it for nestling stage.
Here is a statement in a paper in Studies of Avian Biology 34. On page 119 to 120 they say, "For successful nests, an attempt was made to estimate the actual day that the nest fledged young, rather than simply using the last day checked. The latter, if different, would unjustifiably add survival days to a nest when failure was no longer possible. You don't want to bias upward. But, when they say they attempted to ESTIMATE the actual day the nest fledged, that makes me think they did something rather than just using the last day known alive as the end (Took midpoint, estimated from age of young, estimated from median nestling days for species or something..... ).
So what is the correct way to code nests? For successful nests do you use the last day checked and known alive as the end of the nest? Do you estimate a day between the last day checked and alive and the last day checked? Is this method simply no good for altricial bird nests?
Thanks for any help.
Kent